00906nas a2200145 4500008004100000245003600041210003600077300001200113490000700125520046200132653002400594653005600618100002500674856006100699 1989 fra d00aDe la temporalité linguistique0 aDe la temporalité linguistique a21–250 v143 a
Problems concerning aspect and tense in Russian and French are discussed. Special attention is paid to actual (aspectual) present tense. With respect to the syntactic pattern it is assumed that the marked aspectual character of the Russian verb and the small number of tense forms has something to do with the comparative uniformity of morpho-syntactic means; in French, conversely, the various tenses determine its great morpho-syntactic complexity.
10aContrastive Studies10aсъпоставителни изследвания1 aFontaine, Jacqueline uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/fontaine198901105nas a2200145 4500008004100000245003800041210003400079300001200113490000600125520066200131653002400793653005600817100002500873856006100898 1982 fra d00aA propos de la notion d’aoriste0 apropos de la notion d aoriste a36–430 v73 aThe aorist structure in modern Russian is studied on the basis of its different characteristic morpho-syntactic manifestations. In the ideal case aorist (perfective) structure is defined as the only one to characterize the narrative type of text (cf. H. Weinreich’s work on grammar tenses). As a notion pertaining to text syntax, this form lends itself to morpho-syntactic con125 figurations which belong to the complex sentence: agreement, subordination by means of conjunctions or adverbial participles. The consequences of the obligatory co-existence between the perfective and imperfective forms in a real, non-ideal text are discussed as well.
10aContrastive Studies10aсъпоставителни изследвания1 aFontaine, Jacqueline uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/fontaine1982