00575nas a2200109   4500008003900000245012700039210012700166300001200293490000600305100004100311856011300352       1985                          d00aУточняющие слова в староболгарских и старобелорусских памятниках0 aУточняющие слова в староболгарских и старобелорусских памятниках  a73–780 v91 aМуталимова, Муминат  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0198500591nas a2200109   4500008003900000245014600039210012400185300001200309490000600321100004100327856011300368       1984                          d00aЧужие слова и способы их передачи в староболгарских памятниках письменности0 aЧужие слова и способы их передачи в староболгарских памятниках п  a90–960 v81 aМуталимова, Муминат  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0198401703nas a2200121   4500008004100000245019900041210012400240300001200364490000600376520104500382100004101427856011301468       1979                        bul d00aСъществителни със значение на лице във функцията на допълнение в старобългарския и старобелоруския език.0 aСъществителни със значение на лице във функцията на допълнение в  a17–230 v43 aThe special uses of nouns denoting persons in the function of object in verbal combinations and excerpted from written records of Old Bulgarian and Old Byelorussian literature are considered. The comparison of the written records of the two languages shows that the nouns denoting persons in the function of objects exhibit not only common meanings and structural characteristics but considerable differences as well. In general the differences do not refer to the universal model of v + n in the accusative and dative cases. That type of construction is common to both Old Bulgarian and Old Byelorussian written records. The incorporation of new elements in the word combinations results in both structural and semantic changes. Besides the construction with transitive verbs and nouns in the accusative, the author also considers the so-called double accusative and dative; these double cases in the Old Byelorussian records have been ousted by other syntactic structures: the predicative instrumental and subordinate attributive clauses.1 aМуталимова, Муминат  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0197900632nas a2200109   4500008003900000245018400039210012700223300001200350490000600362100004100368856011300409       1978                          d00aНекоторые особенности употребления существительных со значением лица в староболгарских текстах0 aНекоторые особенности употребления существительных со значением   a72–790 v21 aМуталимова, Муминат  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B01978