00755nam a2200193 4500008004100000245005300041210005300094250000600147260004700153100003900200700003300239700002900272700003100301700002500332700003300357700003300390700003100423856010700454 2006 bul d00aБългарски тълковен речник0 aБългарски тълковен речник a4 aСофияbНаука и изкуство1 aАндрейчин, Любомир1 aГеоргиев, Любен1 aИлчев, Стефан1 aКостов, Никола1 aЛеков, Иван1 aСтойков, Стойко1 aТодоров, Цветан1 aПопов, Димитър uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BD200600674nam a2200181 4500008004100000245005300041210005300094260002300147300000900170100003900179700002500218700002900243700002200272700002500294700003300319700003300352856010700385 1993 bul d00aБългарски тълковен речник0 aБългарски тълковен речник aСофияbБАН a10781 aАндрейчин, Любомир1 aГеоргиев, Л1 aИлчев, Стефан1 aКостов, Н.1 aЛеков, Иван1 aСтойков, Стойко1 aТодоров, Цветан uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BD199302431nas a2200145 4500008004100000245022400041210012500265300001100390490000600401520169000407653002402097653005602121100002502177856008302202 1978 bul d00aКъм по-приемлива анализа и постройка на опитите за съпоставителни и типологични изследвания в славянското езикознание0 aКъм поприемлива анализа и постройка на опитите за съпоставителни a3–130 v33 a

Through distribution and stratification, the author aims at a more accurate characterization of the various methods (contrastive and typological in particular) used in Slavonic language studies. The study has been prompted by the existing inconsistency in their formulation which is, to a certain extent, understandable. The starting point is the continuity and mutual complementation of all methods of study used so far. The relative difference between these methods stems from their attitude towards the presumed parent language prototype of the phenomena which is valid only for the comparative method. The Slavonic languages, being genealogically related, display a number of structures (zones and objects) which can be studied not only comparatively but also contrastively and typologically. Thus, for example, a number of contrastive studies of languages in contact during the post- Proto-Slavonic period, such as the Byelorussian and Russian akan’e, the Polish mazurzenie etc. differ from the typological interpretation of phenomena such as the system of obligatory՛ open syllables in the Proto-Slavonic period, the appearance of the genus virile in some Slavonic languages, the Bulgarian citational forms, etc. A potential relationship and interdependence are assumed to exist between descriptive, comparative and historical linguistics. The reliability of the contrastive method is enhanced by соmparison, while it sometimes loses validity if the historical principle is neglected. The typological method is becoming increasingly reliable since it applies to the essential parameters and universal categories of language and facilitates its dynamic characterology.

10aContrastive Studies10aсъпоставителни изследвания1 aЛеков, Иван uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2197800601nas a2200121 4500008004100000245014300041210012600184260002300310300001300333100002500346700002500371856008300396 1977 bul d00aСистема от основни закономерности в характерологията на славянските езици0 aСистема от основни закономерности в характерологията на славянск aСофияbБАН a7 – 361 aЛеков, Иван1 aЛеков, Иван uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2197701602nas a2200145 4500008004100000245020700041210012500248300001400373490000600387520087500393653002401268653005601292100002501348856008301373 1976 bul d00aСъпоставителният анализ на белоруския и българския език в рамките на родствените отношения между двата езика0 aСъпоставителният анализ на белоруския и българския език в рамкит a149–1600 v13 a

Contrastive analysis is becoming increasingly popular, although it has been used in the past, especially in combination with the comparative-historical approach. Byelorussian and Bulgarian have received little attention in this respect. The article raises some general problems of the comparison between the two genetically related languages. Byelorussian is a typical inflecting North Slavic language while Bulgarian is predominantly analytical. The first has been subject to bilingual contacts and convergence to the east and west, while the second, to multilingual Balkan influences. For the first, phonetic contact and syntactic separation have been more important, versus Bulgarian grammatical isolation. The differentiation of the two languages is largely based on socio-linguistic factors. Some tentative forecasts for future developments are also offered.

10aContrastive Studies10aсъпоставителни изследвания1 aЛеков, Иван uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2197601406nas a2200145 4500008004100000245015900041210012400200300001200324490000600336520072900342653002401071653005601095100002501151856008401176 1976 bul d00aЯвна и „скрита“ глаголна съпоставителна проблематика на полския и българския език0 aЯвна и скрита глаголна съпоставителна проблематика на полския и  a65–820 v13 a

Explicit“ and „implicit“ problems in the study of the verb in Polish and Bulgarian are the topic of the present article. Some of the general conclusions reached are as follows. The comparative development of the two genetically related languages is one of differentiation. The growing distance is due to developments of both conjugation and declension. Two types of factors are at work, sociolinguistic and structural-linguistic. In the sphere of the verb Polish shows a combination of inflection, agglutination and analyticity. There are hardly any traces of agglutination in Bulgarian. New hybrid, contextually determined forms, based on verbal components, is appearing in Polish as a result of agglutination.

10aContrastive Studies10aсъпоставителни изследвания1 aЛеков, Иван uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B21976a00539nam a2200097 4500008004100000245012000041210012000161260005200281100002500333856008300358 1941 bul d00aХарактеристика на общите черти в български и източнославянски0 aХарактеристика на общите черти в български и източнославянски aСофияbДържавна печатница1 aЛеков, Иван uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B21941