00611nas a2200121   4500008004100000245012100041210012100162300001200283490000700295100003500302700004300337856010900380       2006                        bul d00aБългарското кисело мляко и неговите названия в българския език0 aБългарското кисело мляко и неговите названия в българския език  a33–410 v121 aБалкански, Тодор1 aДимитрова, Маргарита  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B82006-100611nas a2200121   4500008004100000245012100041210012100162300001200283490000700295100003500302700004300337856010900380       2006                        bul d00aБългарското кисело мляко и неговите названия в българския език0 aБългарското кисело мляко и неговите названия в българския език  a33–410 v121 aБалкански, Тодор1 aДимитрова, Маргарита  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B82006-000484nas a2200109   4500008004100000245008500041210008500126300001400211490000700225100003500232856010700267       2006                        bul d00aПризрачната еклезиономия в Средните Родопи0 aПризрачната еклезиономия в Средните Родопи  a118–1200 v121 aБалкански, Тодор  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8200600646nas a2200121   4500008004100000245016700041210012500208300001200333490000700345100003500352700002900387856010800416       2005                        bul d00aБългарските етноразличителни онимни знаци в разказа на Иван Вазов „Саломоновият цирк“0 aБългарските етноразличителни онимни знаци в разказа на Иван Вазо  a61–660 v111 aБалкански, Тодор1 aКондов, Васил  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8-200501611nas a2200133   4500008004100000245016200041210012400203300001100327490000700338520095300345100003501298700003701333856010701370       1986                        bul d00aОпит за изучаване на първобългарските следи в българския и карачаево-балкарския език0 aОпит за изучаване на първобългарските следи в българския и карач  a5–140 v113 a<p>o far Bulgarian linguistics has looked for traces of Proto-Bulgarian primarily in the Čuvaš language as a mediator. The authors of the paper abandon this approach and investigate the linguistic and historical connection between Bulgarian and the Balkar-Karačaev language. As a result of that novel approach a number of new words, both from the onomastic and non-onomastic classes have been added to the established Proto-Bulgarian ones: bălgarin băalkăar, măalkăar, kopanec, čeren tatarin, čavka, tajče, Tangra-Tejri, Atila, Asparuh, Šibil, Kospartov and Šabla. It was found that for the purposes of defining more accurately the Proto-Bulgarian lexical layer, the Karačaevo-Balkar language offers a number of advantages as compared to Čuvaš. Evidence was also found to substantiate the claim that the Karačaevo-Balkar language is the most suitable mediator for studies of the Rumanian substratum of the Bulgarian language.</p>
1 aБалкански, Тодор1 aХашходжов, Едуард  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8198601543nas a2200121   4500008004100000245009300041210009200134300001200226490000700238520103400245100003501279856010701314       1985                        bul d00aМонголски езикови следи в родопската топонимия.0 aМонголски езикови следи в родопската топонимия  a41–440 v103 aSome problems concerning the traces of Mongolian in the toponymic system and in ethnonymy of the Northern parts of the Rhodope Mountains are discussed in the paper. Plenty of contrastive toponymic material relating to the Mongolian languages has been collected from the areas of the Soviet Republics in Central Asia and from Mongolia to prove the etymology of some local toponyms in the Rhodope region, like Semèr ulà, Bèlja, and Hajrerob, as well as the origin of the ethnonym kalmùk. The toponyms must have been introduced to the Bulgarian speech community within the period ranging from 1380 to 1750 by shepherds of Turkic origin who had started for the Balkan Peninsula from the areas in Central Asia, where the names under discussion occur quite frequently and are derived from Mongolian geographical terms. Another point the paper attempts to put across is that it was not only the Proto-Bulgarians who brought all the traces of Mongolian culture to the Balkan Peninsula, as some scholars in this country seem to imply.1 aБалкански, Тодор  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B81985