01386nas a2200121   4500008004100000245009900041210009600140300001200236490000700248520089100255100002901146856008901175       2005                        bul d00aСтаронемски и старобългарски лични имена на -mar/-мер0 aСтаронемски и старобългарски лични имена на marмер  a26–400 v303 aDer Artikel setzt sich zum Ziel, die althochdeutschen und die altbulgarischen proprialen Komposita, in denen das Namenelement ahd. -mār/abulg. -měrъ als Hinterglied fungiert, einer komparativen Analyse zu unterziehen. Als Wortart ist dieses Namenelement ein Adjektiv. Es lassen sich folgende Wortbildungstypen unterscheiden: Gemeinsam für beide Namensysteme sind die Strukturen Substantiv + Adjektiv, Adjektiv + Adjektiv und Verbalstamm + Adjektiv. Nur für das Ahd. typisch ist Adverb + Adjektiv, nur altbulgarisch ist Präposition + Adjektiv. Die Semantik der Vorderglieder, die in Verbindung mit -mar/-mer auftreten, ist mannigfaltig. Gemeinsam für beide Sprachen sind Namenglieder, die zu den semantischen Gruppen „Krieg“ und „Mensch“ gehören. Die Bedeutungssphären „Recht“, „Religion“, „Farben“ und „Natur“ sind nur in ahd. Vordergliedern zu belegen.1 aПетков, Марин  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2200500449nas a2200109   4500008003900000245008100039210008100120300001200201490000700213100002900220856009000249       1993                          d00aДва превода на Житието на Григорий Велики0 aДва превода на Житието на Григорий Велики  a27–350 v171 aПетков, Петко  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B21993a00590nas a2200109   4500008003900000245018200039210012200221300001200343490000700355100002900362856008900391       1993                          d00aТрадиции в спомена за Кирил и Методий в България през {ХІІІ–ХІV} век – опит за нова интерпретация0 aТрадиции в спомена за Кирил и Методий в България през ХІІІ–ХІV в  a46–610 v171 aПетков, Кирил  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2199300556nas a2200109   4500008003900000245014200039210012700181300001200308490000600320100003100326856008900357       1980                          d00aВзгляды Константина Костенечкого на литературный язык славянских народов0 aВзгляды Константина Костенечкого на литературный язык славянских  a92–990 v41 aПетков, Георги  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2198002278nas a2200121   4500008004100000245013900041210012500180300001100305490000600316520171600322100002902038856008902067       1978                        bul d00aОпит за класификация на частните дисциплини в сравнителното езикознание0 aОпит за класификация на частните дисциплини в сравнителното език  a7–180 v33 aThe separate branches of comparative linguistics are classified according to the different kinds of similarities between languages which are the basis of comparative analysis. This tertium comparationis is defined depending on the theoretical aims of the study or its orientation towards a specific field of application. Five separate branches may be distinguished in general comparative linguistics: historical comparative linguistics, area linguistics, typology, comparative transferology and contrastive translatology (konfrontative Translatologie). Special attention is paid to the last three disciplines. The tendency to classify languages and linguistic structures into two fields of applied studies (foreign language teaching and translation practice) is proved to determine the presence of a different tertium comparationis, hence, the differences in the object of study. The comparison of these three branches reveals the intermediate position of comparative transferology. This branch is markedly orientated towards foreign language teaching since it is based upon an equivalent tertium comparationis both in the expression plane and the content plane (the phonological level is an exception). In typology, however, the tertium comparationis is optional and of secondary importance; in contrastive translatology (konfrontative Translatologie) it is altogether missing. Taking into consideration the basic chronological plane of study and the similarities between the respective tertia comparationis, the separate branches of comparative linguistics may be subsumed under two more general disciplines: comparative diachronic linguistics and comparative synchronic linguistics (contrastive linguistics).1 aПетков, Павел  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2197801583nas a2200121   4500008004100000245006600041210006600107300001100173490000600184520115000190100003101340856009001371       1978                        bul d00aТаксономия на речевите стойности0 aТаксономия на речевите стойности  a3–110 v33 aThe present attempt at the taxonomy of speech values is based on the most general theoretical principles of the unity of act, sound structure, social value and is a continuation of the author’s paper on the system of speech ways. The approach aims at establishing the universal features in languages as act-and-value systems. Taxonomy is assumed to be based not on words considered in the case as complex idiom-like structures, but on the semantization of speech acts and their respective features in the sound structures. The dependence of the values on the speech acts and ways comes to the fore: this approach is different from most existing semantic taxonomic theories which are based on the so-called conceptual meaning of words and are, therefore, hardly differentiated from taxonomies in the respective non-linguistic sciences. This dependence can be called an inner motivation of the sound structures and their respective values in contrast to the ideophonic and derivational motivation of the word. It is presumed that, in so far as the speech ways are universal. anguages will exhibit a greater uniformity when studied contrastively.1 aПетков, Славчо  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B21978a00945nas a2200121   4500008004100000245023200041210012600273300001100399490000600410520028700416100003100703856008900734       1976                        bul d00aСистемата на речевите начини – основа за съпоставително изследване на езиците (Le système des modes de parole – base d’une étude contrastive des langues)0 aСистемата на речевите начини основа за съпоставително изследване  a3–260 v13 aL’article représente une partie des résultats d’une expérience visant à démontrer les relations systématisantes l’activité linguistique. Le système des modes de parole qui y est décrit peut aussi servir à une étude contrastive des langues du point de vue dynamique.1 aПетков, Славчо  uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B21976