00516nas a2200097 4500008004100000245013600041210012400177490000700301100004100308856006900349 2016 bul d00aОт историзираната философия до философията на историята при Пол Рикьор0 aОт историзираната философия до философията на историята при Пол 0 v131 aГерджиков, Георги, А uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/lilijournal/2016/13/1/ggerdzhikov00408nas a2200109 4500008004100000245007600041210007600117300000900193490000600202100003700208856005300245 2000 bul d00aКатегорията време като хиперкатегория0 aКатегорията време като хиперкатегория a3-160 v11 aГерджиков, Георги uhttp://liternet.bg/publish/ggerdzhikov/hyper.htm00511nas a2200097 4500008004100000245010700041210010700148300001400255100003700269856010700306 2000 bul d00aОрганизацията на многочленните морфологични парадигми0 aОрганизацията на многочленните морфологични парадигми a150–1521 aГерджиков, Георги uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%B3%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2200000580nas a2200097 4500008004100000245016200041210012500203300001000328100003700338856010700375 1999 bul d00aКритериите за насоката на субординацията между членовете на граматическите опозиции0 aКритериите за насоката на субординацията между членовете на грам a57-851 aГерджиков, Георги uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/%D0%B3%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2199902172nas a2200121 4500008004100000245017100041210012500212300001400337490000700351520159200358100003701950856006301987 1990 bul d00aРазвоят на индоевропейските езици към аналитизъм и някои всеобщи типологични зависимости0 aРазвоят на индоевропейските езици към аналитизъм и някои всеобщи a151–1570 v153 a
A method is proposed for measuring various typological indices of morphological paradigms: the average degree of syntheticity (s) and the reciprocal index, the average degree of analyticity (a), the average degree of compositionality (c); the average degree of markedness (m); and the reciprocal index (m), which can be considered as an index of amorphologism (or, in the historical plane, of demorphologization). It is proved on this basis that in language c = a . m and, correspondingly, a = cm. That is why the development towards analyticity leads to the development of composed forms or to demorphologization. Further on, an index of the average degree of discretization of grammatical information on a formal level is introduced (d), and an index of the average degree of polimorphemity of word forms (π) which is one of the indicators of agglutination. On this basis the correlation d = a . π is put forward. Languages tend towards a high d because thus a high degree of isomorphism between the level of expression and the level of content is achieved. However, while in agglutinative languages high d is achieve mainly through high π, i. е. it follows from the agglutinative structure itself, in inflexion languages d is achieved mainly through the increase of a and only partly through the increase of π. And finally out of the first two equations it follows that d = c . m . π (cf. the three ways in which d is increased in the history of Indo-European languages). The correlations are only part of the typological laws which can be explicated in the same fashion.
1 aГерджиков, Георги uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/gerdzhikov199001709nas a2200121 4500008004100000245015400041210012600195300001200321490000600333520114800339100003701487856006301524 1983 bul d00aТенденцията към аналитизъм – определение, метод за измерване, причини, следствия0 aТенденцията към аналитизъм определение метод за измерване причин a46–550 v83 aIt may be assumed that the degree of analyticity of a certain language corresponds to the average value of grammatical information, carried by the word forms of this language. The paper discusses a method for working out the average value of grammatical information carried by a word form. It is pointed out that the tendency towards analyticity might bring the reduction in the number of substantival categories, but it does preserve and even increases the number of verbal categories. Agglutinative languages distribute the grammatical information among a great number of morphemes. Inflectional languages, on the contrary, focus whole chunks of in- formation on a single morpheme – the inflexion. The development towards analyticity results in the situation where, in a similar way, information begins to be transmitted and received by formally autonomous parts. Thus, the very nature of inflexion carries the starting point of the tendency towards analyticity. The analytic organization of a language, however, preserves the maximum autonomy and the distinctive character of word classes, characteristic of inflectional languages.
1 aГерджиков, Георги uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/gerdzhikov198301383nas a2200121 4500008004100000245018200041210012500223300001200348490000600360520079500366100003701161856006301198 1982 bul d00aТъй нареченото преизказване и въпросът за модалните категории, които глаголът може да притежава0 aТъй нареченото преизказване и въпросът за модалните категории ко a21–380 v73 aIn Bulgarian there are four modes of speech quotation, depending on the specific features of the information expressed by the verb: a testimonial mode (modus testimonialis), an inferential mode (modus conclusivus), a reproductory mode (modus renarrativus) and a mode of distrust (modus inveritativus). A clear-cut distinction should be made between the categories ‘mode of expression of the action’ (modus dicendi actionis) and ‘mood’. The category of ‘mood’ can also be defined as ‘mode of action’ (modus actionis). Linguistic theory must break, once and for all, with the notion that the verb may have no more than one modal category. As any other grammatical category, except in cases of neutralization, the category of modus dicendi is obligatory for the speaker.
1 aГерджиков, Георги uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/librislavici/gerdzhikov1982