@article {Гешев2007,
	title = {Ранноновобългарската падежна система},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {31},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {40{\textendash}64},
	author = {Гешев, Валентин}
}
@article {Гешев2004,
	title = {H посъла къ дѢлателемъ рабъ Названия за обществени и стопански понятия в старобългарския евангелски текст като свидетелства за устройство},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {28},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {88{\textendash}99},
	author = {Гешев, Валентин}
}
@article {Гешев2003,
	title = {Да хвърлех по отсрещния прозорец},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {28},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {36{\textendash}46},
	abstract = {The article considers the interaction of tense and aspect with verbs expressing hypothetic modality in Modern Greek, Modern Bulgarian and Modern Polish (as a representative of Northern Slavic) with a special attention to the paradoxical ability of the Greek and the Bulgarian modal imperfect to denote momentary actions or their result. It claims that in the past tenses the meaning of the Greek verbal stem is more temporal and modal and less aspectual, while in the future tense, in the imperative and in subjunctive constructions it shows a considerable semantic symmetry with Bulgarian and Northern Slavic verbal aspect.},
	author = {Гешев, Валентин}
}
@article {Гешев1999,
	title = {Възможни старобългарски свидетелства за древни значения на индоевропейския винителен падеж},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {23},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {96{\textendash}103},
	author = {Гешев, Валентин}
}
@article {Гешев1993,
	title = {Промените в една частна синтактична система в славянските езици},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Conrastive linguistics},
	volume = {18},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {16{\textendash}20},
	abstract = {The article sets out to identify certain mechanisms of structural change in the syntactic configuration of the object noun phrase in predicates with the meaning of {\textquoteleft}to look like{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}be similar to{\textquoteright} in the Slavic languages. In that the author has sought to establish the relation between the syntactic changes in the noun phrase and the semantic changes in the specific predicative lexemes, with an emphasis on etymology. The role of predicates meaning movement, as well as of the syntax of the object noun phrases in the syntactic system under discussion is also touched upon; attention is focused on its state at an earlier stage in the development of Bulgarian. The South and East Slavic origin of the object construction in Modern Bulgarian and the absence of an explicit influence of the language context in the Balkans upon the above predicates are shown. Brief mention is made of an Indo-European retrospective view on the constructions and of regional typological and genetic parallels and mutual influences among remotely related languages.},
	author = {Гешев, Валентин}
}
@article {Трифонова1989,
	title = {Х международен конгрес на славистите (София, 14{\textendash}22.IX.1988)},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {14},
	year = {1989},
	pages = {113{\textendash}128},
	keywords = {Events, Хроника},
	author = {Трифонова, Йорданка and Гешев, Валентин and Ангелова, Искра and Бояджиева, Елисавета and Милева, Виолета and Малджиева, Вяра and Виларова, Маргарита and Михалик, Ришард}
}
