@book {Стефанова1999,
	title = {Паралингвистичният етикетен език},
	year = {1999},
	publisher = {Антос},
	organization = {Антос},
	address = {Шумен},
	author = {Стефанова, Марияна}
}
@book {Стефанова1997,
	title = {Познаваме ли българския речев етикет},
	year = {1997},
	publisher = {???},
	organization = {???},
	address = {София},
	author = {Стефанова, Марияна}
}
@inbook {Стефанова1994b,
	title = {Паралингвистичната етикетна кинетика в българската книжовно-разговорна реч. В: Проблеми на българската разговорна реч, книга втора, . . .ите},
	booktitle = {Проблеми на българската разговорна реч},
	volume = {2},
	year = {1994},
	pages = {142 {\textendash} 152},
	publisher = {Университетско издателство {\quotedblbase}Свв. Кирил и Методий{\textquotedblleft}},
	organization = {Университетско издателство {\quotedblbase}Свв. Кирил и Методий{\textquotedblleft}},
	address = {Велико Търново},
	author = {Стефанова, Марияна}
}
@inbook {Стефанова1994,
	title = {Паралингвистичните етикетни знаци в българското речево общуване днес},
	booktitle = {Хуманитарно обучение и възпитание},
	volume = {4},
	year = {1994},
	pages = {568 {\textendash}576},
	publisher = {ВВМУ Н. Й. Вапцаров},
	organization = {ВВМУ Н. Й. Вапцаров},
	author = {Стефанова, Марияна}
}
@inbook {Стефанова1994a,
	title = {Теоретичен модел на българската етикетна кинетика},
	booktitle = {Хуманитарно обучение и възпитание},
	volume = {4},
	year = {1994},
	pages = {576 {\textendash} 584},
	publisher = {ВВМУ Н. Й. Вапцаров},
	organization = {ВВМУ Н. Й. Вапцаров},
	author = {Стефанова, Марияна}
}
@article {Стефанова1990,
	title = {За българския етикет като семиотична система},
	journal = {Проблеми на социолингвистиката},
	volume = {2},
	year = {1990},
	pages = {198 {\textendash} 206},
	author = {Стефанова, Марияна}
}
@article {Стефанова1985,
	title = {За някои видове терминологични фразеологизми във френския език и функционалните им съответствия в немския и българския език},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {10},
	year = {1985},
	pages = {8{\textendash}17},
	abstract = {The paper considers а unique phenomenon in French terminology: metaphorical phraseological terms. By giving corresponding equivalents and comparing them, some conclusions have been drawn as regards the functional equivalents of these French terms in German and Bulgarian, including the instances of either presence or absence of metaphor in the translation equivalents. By setting the proper place and role of imagery in the material under investigation, a preliminary classification of the French metaphorical terms has been attempted.},
	author = {Стефанова, Лидия and Приматарова-Милчева, Антоанета}
}
@article {Стефанова1984,
	title = {Международен колоквиум по превод и съпоставителни изследвания между романски и славянски езици},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {9},
	year = {1984},
	pages = {123},
	keywords = {Events, Хроника},
	author = {Стефанова, Лидия}
}
@article {Стефанова1978,
	title = {Симултанният превод {\textendash} психокатализатор на потенциалната интерференция между родния и чужд език},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {3},
	year = {1978},
	pages = {62{\textendash}72},
	abstract = {The knowledge of the structural and semantic correspondences and differences between the native and the foreign language is an important prerequisite for increasing the effectiveness of foreign language teaching by recognizing, in time, the errors due to interference factors. Traditional studies lack the complete reliability and objectivity of the registered primary information: conditions change, perceptions are momentary and the researcher{\textquoteright}s approach is subjective. A hypothesis about the role of simultaneous translation as a psycho-catalyst of potential interference has been formulated on the basis of psycholinguistic analysis. The hypothesis has been tested experimentally, through electronic equipment with no contact at all, under equal conditions, which has ensured an objective recording of the primary information and of the errors and has ultimately created the conditions for their rigorous typological classification. The statistical data processing has proved the applicability of the conclusions to generalizations. The results are to be subjected to further tests aiming at an objective establishment of a system of the most typical differences between Bulgarian and French and the determination of the most effective methods used in language teaching.},
	author = {Стефанова, Лидия and Манчев, Йордан}
}
