@article {Петков2005,
	title = {Старонемски и старобългарски лични имена на -mar/-мер},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {30},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {26{\textendash}40},
	abstract = {Der Artikel setzt sich zum Ziel, die althochdeutschen und die altbulgarischen proprialen Komposita, in denen das Namenelement ahd. -m{\={a}}r/abulg. -m{\v e}rъ als Hinterglied fungiert, einer komparativen Analyse zu unterziehen. Als Wortart ist dieses Namenelement ein Adjektiv. Es lassen sich folgende Wortbildungstypen unterscheiden: Gemeinsam f{\"u}r beide Namensysteme sind die Strukturen Substantiv + Adjektiv, Adjektiv + Adjektiv und Verbalstamm + Adjektiv. Nur f{\"u}r das Ahd. typisch ist Adverb + Adjektiv, nur altbulgarisch ist Pr{\"a}position + Adjektiv. Die Semantik der Vorderglieder, die in Verbindung mit -mar/-mer auftreten, ist mannigfaltig. Gemeinsam f{\"u}r beide Sprachen sind Namenglieder, die zu den semantischen Gruppen {\quotedblbase}Krieg{\textquotedblleft} und {\quotedblbase}Mensch{\textquotedblleft} geh{\"o}ren. Die Bedeutungssph{\"a}ren {\quotedblbase}Recht{\textquotedblleft}, {\quotedblbase}Religion{\textquotedblleft}, {\quotedblbase}Farben{\textquotedblleft} und {\quotedblbase}Natur{\textquotedblleft} sind nur in ahd. Vordergliedern zu belegen.},
	author = {Петков, Марин}
}
@article {Петков1993a,
	title = {Два превода на Житието на Григорий Велики},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {17},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {27{\textendash}35},
	author = {Петков, Петко}
}
@article {Петков1993,
	title = {Традиции в спомена за Кирил и Методий в България през {ХІІІ{\textendash}ХІV} век {\textendash} опит за нова интерпретация},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {17},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {46{\textendash}61},
	author = {Петков, Кирил}
}
@article {Петков1980,
	title = {Взгляды Константина Костенечкого на литературный язык славянских народов},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {4},
	year = {1980},
	pages = {92{\textendash}99},
	author = {Петков, Георги}
}
@article {Петков1978,
	title = {Опит за класификация на частните дисциплини в сравнителното езикознание},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {3},
	year = {1978},
	pages = {7{\textendash}18},
	abstract = {The separate branches of comparative linguistics are classified according to the different kinds of similarities between languages which are the basis of comparative analysis. This tertium comparationis is defined depending on the theoretical aims of the study or its orientation towards a specific field of application. Five separate branches may be distinguished in general comparative linguistics: historical comparative linguistics, area linguistics, typology, comparative transferology and contrastive translatology (konfrontative Translatologie). Special attention is paid to the last three disciplines. The tendency to classify languages and linguistic structures into two fields of applied studies (foreign language teaching and translation practice) is proved to determine the presence of a different tertium comparationis, hence, the differences in the object of study. The comparison of these three branches reveals the intermediate position of comparative transferology. This branch is markedly orientated towards foreign language teaching since it is based upon an equivalent tertium comparationis both in the expression plane and the content plane (the phonological level is an exception). In typology, however, the tertium comparationis is optional and of secondary importance; in contrastive translatology (konfrontative Translatologie) it is altogether missing. Taking into consideration the basic chronological plane of study and the similarities between the respective tertia comparationis, the separate branches of comparative linguistics may be subsumed under two more general disciplines: comparative diachronic linguistics and comparative synchronic linguistics (contrastive linguistics).},
	author = {Петков, Павел}
}
@article {Петков1978a,
	title = {Таксономия на речевите стойности},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {3},
	year = {1978},
	pages = {3{\textendash}11},
	abstract = {The present attempt at the taxonomy of speech values is based on the most general theoretical principles of the unity of act, sound structure, social value and is a continuation of the author{\textquoteright}s paper on the system of speech ways. The approach aims at establishing the universal features in languages as act-and-value systems. Taxonomy is assumed to be based not on words considered in the case as complex idiom-like structures, but on the semantization of speech acts and their respective features in the sound structures. The dependence of the values on the speech acts and ways comes to the fore: this approach is different from most existing semantic taxonomic theories which are based on the so-called conceptual meaning of words and are, therefore, hardly differentiated from taxonomies in the respective non-linguistic sciences. This dependence can be called an inner motivation of the sound structures and their respective values in contrast to the ideophonic and derivational motivation of the word. It is presumed that, in so far as the speech ways are universal. anguages will exhibit a greater uniformity when studied contrastively.},
	author = {Петков, Славчо}
}
@article {Петков1976,
	title = {Системата на речевите начини {\textendash} основа за съпоставително изследване на езиците (Le syst{\`e}me des modes de parole {\textendash} base d{\textquoteright}une {\'e}tude contrastive des langues)},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {1},
	year = {1976},
	pages = {3{\textendash}26},
	abstract = {L{\textquoteright}article repr{\'e}sente une partie des r{\'e}sultats d{\textquoteright}une exp{\'e}rience visant {\`a} d{\'e}montrer les relations syst{\'e}matisantes l{\textquoteright}activit{\'e} linguistique. Le syst{\`e}me des modes de parole qui y est d{\'e}crit peut aussi servir {\`a} une {\'e}tude contrastive des langues du point de vue dynamique.},
	author = {Петков, Славчо}
}
