@article {Деянова2014,
	title = {Към строежа на сложните съставни изречения в Ловешкия дамаскин},
	journal = {Българска реч},
	volume = {20},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {91 {\textendash} 109},
	abstract = {<p>The complex sentences are described from the viewpoint of their conjunctions and correlative elements in the main clause. The paper analyses the mutual juxtaposition of the main and subordinate clauses as well as the optional use of coordinating conjunctions after some types of antepositional subordinate clauses. Emphasis is placed on the frequency and importance of the prospective phenomena present in the literary language during the National Revival.</p>},
	keywords = {anteposition and postposition of the subordinate clause, correlative elements, correlative use of tenses, subordinating conjunction},
	author = {Деянова, Мария}
}
@article {Деянова1987,
	title = {Към историята на словореда в българските да-конструкции},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {11},
	year = {1987},
	pages = {23{\textendash}40},
	author = {Деянова, Мария}
}
@article {Деянова1987,
	title = {Някои начини на действие при украинския глагол в съпоставка с българския},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {12},
	year = {1987},
	pages = {20{\textendash}27},
	abstract = {This is a contrastive study of the distributive and attenuative Aktionsart (mode of action), based on data from Modern Ukrainian and Bulgarian. The following issues are considered: productivity of the Aktionsart (approximate number of lexemes); formal diversity of the exponents (number and relative productivity of the respective word-formative markers in the two languages); distribution of each formal marker, i. e. characterization of the source verbs in terms of lexical semantics, Aktionsart, aspect, in/transitivity; possibility for the formal marker (prefix) to occur as a second to the root affix; stylistic colouring of the derivative verbs; relationship between each Aktionsart and the perfective/imperfective opposition and hence, the position of the respective Aktionsart in the aspectual system of the language.},
	author = {Деянова, Мария}
}
@article {Деянова1981,
	title = {Подчинени обстоятелствени изречения със съюза дa/da в българския и словенския книжовен език},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {6},
	year = {1981},
	pages = {21{\textendash}30},
	abstract = {The contrastive analysis of adverbial clauses introduced with the conjunction да reveals the national characteristics of each language belonging to an old common South-Slavonic area {\textendash} subordination through да. The similarities between Bulgarian and Slovene in that respect con38 cern, above all, the sphere of application of the да conjunction in substance: it introduces almost identical types of subordinate adverbial clauses with the exception of clauses of time, degree and manner (possible only in Slovene). However, the two languages exhibit more or less considerable differences in the inner structure of complex sentences with subordinate adverbial clauses, which differences also concern the functioning of the temporal and modal forms, the role of the correlative indicative elements in the main clause and the stylistic characteristics of some types of subordinate clauses.},
	author = {Деянова, Мария}
}
@article {Деянова1978,
	title = {Конструкции с факултативно предикативно определение в чешкия книжовен език в съпоставка с българския},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {3},
	year = {1978},
	pages = {54{\textendash}64},
	abstract = {The following problems were analysed: 1) constructions with non-detached optional predicatives represented by adjectival words and referring to the subject, treated from the point of view of their lexical realization and the transitivity/intransitivity of the verb-predicate; 2) the interchangeability between this predicative and a derivative adverb; 3) the relationship between the two constructions in the sphere of norm and usage. Considerable similarities have been found between Czech and Bulgarian as regards the lexical and grammatical realization of the constructions with predicatives; with a certain quantitative difference in the area of verbs and transitive verbs in particular. The similarities prevail over the differences also with respect to internal word structure and contextual semantic conditions for the substitution of predicatives by derivative adverbs. The main differences are in the speech realization of the two constructions: the predicative has higher frequency in Bulgarian while the relative adverb predominates in Czech. The use of the Czech predicative is further limited by the use of the present participle and other syntactic synonyms which are more widely used. The development of contemporary Czech (the language of prose) exhibits a tendency towards a restricted use of predicative constructions at the expense of synonymous adverbial constructions.},
	author = {Деянова, Мария}
}
@book {Деянова1970,
	title = {История на сложните минали времена в български, сърбохърватски и словенски език},
	year = {1970},
	pages = {235},
	publisher = {БАН},
	organization = {БАН},
	address = {София},
	author = {Деянова, Мария}
}
