00535nas a2200109 4500008004100000245013800041210012300179300001200302490000700314100003700321856006700358 2013 bul d00aЗа представянето на някои немски заемки в нашите речници на чуждите думи0 aЗа представянето на някои немски заемки в нашите речници на чужд a25–310 v191 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/parashkovov201300626nas a2200109 4500008004100000245022500041210012400266300001400390490000700404100003700411856006800448 2010 bul d00aСпецифика и уникалност на Стефан Младеновия „Речник на чуждите думи в българския език с обяснения за потекло и състав“0 aСпецифика и уникалност на Стефан Младеновия Речник на чуждите ду a16 – 250 v161 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/parashkevov2010a00549nas a2200109 4500008004100000245014900041210012400190300001400314490000700328100003700335856006700372 2010 bul d00aЧужди числителни и техни производни в лексикалната система на българския език0 aЧужди числителни и техни производни в лексикалната система на бъ a35 – 580 v161 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/parashkevov201000398nas a2200109 4500008003900000245006200039210006200101300001400163490000700177100003700184856006700221 2008 d00aЛексикализирани имена на букви0 aЛексикализирани имена на букви a24 – 300 v141 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/parashkevov200800429nas a2200109 4500008004100000245005300041210005300094300001200147490000700159100003700166856011600203 2006 bul d00aНяколко думи за някои думи0 aНяколко думи за някои думи a35–410 v121 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2200600752nas a2200157 4500008004100000245015800041210012700199300001400326490000700340653001100347653001900358100003700377700002700414700003500441856011800476 2006 bul d00aПублична среща-дискусия относно транслитерацията на българските имена на латиница0 aПублична срещадискусия относно транслитерацията на българските и a173–1740 v3110aEvents10aХроника1 aПарашкевов, Борис1 aЧаушев, Асен1 aСтаменов, Христо uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B22006-001337nas a2200145 4500008004100000245012100041210012100162300001200283490000700295520067800302653002200980653003601002100003701038856011601075 1999 bul d00aДекомпозицията като похват при заемането на немски сложни думи0 aДекомпозицията като похват при заемането на немски сложни думи a26–330 v243 a

Gegenstand der Untersuchung ist die gelegentlich vorkommende Kürzung von deutschen Zusammensetzungen bei ihrer Übernahme ins Bulgarische. Erläutert werden die Begriffe Isolierungen und Fragmentierungen als Unterarten der sog. Kopf- und Schwanzwörter. Die Aufdeckung der deutschen Vorlagen von Lehnwörtern wie абрихт, анцуг, блинт, винт,герб, хутпак, щрайх wäre ein Unterpfand dafür, dass die sie betreffende etymologische Information in Nachschlagewerken korrekt sein wird. Erst dann würde man beispielsweise das typographische Fachwort блинт nicht naiverweise auf dt. blind, sondern auf dt. Blinddruck zurückführen.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2199901611nas a2200145 4500008004100000245009700041210009700138300001200235490000700247520100000254653002201254653003601276100003701312856011601349 1993 bul d00aНяколко случая на хетеросемия в балканските езици0 aНяколко случая на хетеросемия в балканските езици a25–300 v183 a

The semantic evolution of words is an indispensable part of their historical development. It is determined both by intralinguistic and extralinguistic factors. In the course of migration, a borrowing can be incorporated within the language of adjacent or remote language communities taking on a modified meaning within the same semantic field. This very divergence in meaning, or heterosemy, across language systems is a constant source of misunderstanding. The article examines the semantic deviation of a number of words common to the Balkan languages.The need to explicitly point out cases of partial or complete heterosemy when learning a foreign language, as a means to avoid interference-induced errors in translation and communication is stressed upon. In addition, the article takes the view that when providing the etymology of borrowings it is appropriate to specify the lexical prototype in the source or intermediary language and to trace the semasiological changes undergone.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2199300462nas a2200133 4500008004100000245004000041210003800081300000700119490000700126653001600133653002600149100003700175856011600212 1992 bul d00aБоян Джонов (1918–1992)0 aБоян Джонов 1918–1992 a820 v1710ain memoriam10aБоян Джонов1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2199201392nas a2200145 4500008004100000245010600041210010600147300001400253490000700267520076100274653002201035653003601057100003701093856011601130 1990 bul d00aСловообразувателни парадигми при интернационализмите0 aСловообразувателни парадигми при интернационализмите a248–2520 v153 a

Examples from the international lexicon are adduced in the article, showing how two or more word-formation paradigms distinguished by a semantic feature are established in the framework of etymologically related derivational sequences. They contain functional-categorial positions which partly reflect in an adequate way the prototype and which are partly replenished with secondary home or foreign formations. For this reason, in the comparison of analogous paradigms in different languages structural and/or semantic deviations are established. Their systematic investigation gives evidence of the development of migration of internationalisms and their timely discovery in foreign language teaching helps the achievement of perfect communication.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2199000472nas a2200133 4500008004100000245003800041210003800079300000800117490000600125653001600131653003800147100003700185856011600222 1984 bul d00aВалентин Кипарски0 aВалентин Кипарски a1320 v910ain memoriam10aВалентин Кипарски1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2198400514nas a2200133 4500008004100000245006400041210006200105300001200167490000600179653002500185653001600210100003700226856011700263 1981 bul d00aConstantini Gălăbov professoris in memoriam (1892–1980)0 aConstantini Gălăbov professoris in memoriam 1892–1980 a84–850 v610aConstantin Gălăbov10ain memoriam1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B21981a01717nas a2200145 4500008004100000245011700041210011600158300001400274490000600288520104400294653002401338653005601362100003701418856011601455 1981 bul d00aНемски, нидерландски и скандинавски заемки в българския език0 aНемски нидерландски и скандинавски заемки в българския език a181–1890 v63 a

The article is а survey of the loan-words borrowed from the modern Germanic languages (with the exception of English) which have penetrated into Bulgarian directly or indirectly for the last 100–150 years. The aim is to give a more complete and correct idea of their number and the regions where they are used. A more detailed analysis is made of the German loan-words and terms (over 950 in number) taken from MA theses, Речник на чуждите думи в българския език [Dictionary of Foreign Words in Bulgarian] and other lexicographic reference books. The Dutch loan-words (about 170) are presented after R. Detrez’s paper with certain additions and examples from South African Dutch. The Scandinavian loan-words (about 50) have been excerpted from Речник на чуждите думи в българския език [Dictionary of Foreign Words in Bulgarian] and other sources. Because of the limited size of the present article the meanings and etymons of the loan-words are not discussed.

10aContrastive Studies10aсъпоставителни изследвания1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2198100534nas a2200133 4500008004100000245007200041210007000113300001200183490000600195653001600201653002800217100003700245856011800282 1981 bul d00aПрофесор доктор Юка Хюркянен (1942–1981)0 aПрофесор доктор Юка Хюркянен 1942–1981 a85–860 v610ain memoriam10aЮка Хюркянен1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B21981-001682nas a2200145 4500008004100000245015800041210012600199300001200325490000600337520096000343653002401303653005601327100003701383856011601420 1979 bul d00aИнтернационални съществителни със суфикс -ция и техните еквиваленти в немския език0 aИнтернационални съществителни със суфикс ция и техните еквивален a20–290 v43 a

The comparison of international substantives ending in -ция in Bulgarian and their equivalents in German reveals a certain variety in the suffixation of the latter: -a(t)ion, -(t)ie, -enz, -anz, deriving from the Latin -(t)io, -(t)ia, -entia, -antia. In order to prevent inaccuracies in the reproduction of the German equivalents by Bulgarians, an additional segmentation that takes into account the component -V(C)-, i. e. vowel (+ consonant) before the syncretic suffix -ция is proposed in the article. On the basis of the transposition models thus established, some rare word-formation aberrations appear. Furthermore, possible stylistic and semantic divergences of structurally identical lexemes in both languages are pointed out. For the purposes of effective communication it is also important that the competition of international and domestic suffixes, as well as the synonymy of international and domestic lexemes should be observed.

10aContrastive Studies10aсъпоставителни изследвания1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2197902581nas a2200145 4500008004100000245016200041210012700203300001400330490000600344520185200350653002402202653005602226100003702282856011602319 1976 bul d00aФункционални еквиваленти на българското възвратно лично местоимение във фински език0 aФункционални еквиваленти на българското възвратно лично местоиме a135–1450 v13 a

Gegenstand der vorliegenden Untersuchung sind die adverbialen Funktionen des Reflexivpronomens (Pronr) ce, cи, ceбe cи und die Ermittlung systemhafter lexikalisch-grammatischer Entsprechungen der bulgarischen Konstruktionen V + Pronr im Finnischen. Analysiert wurden vier Funktionsbereiche des Pronr: 1. Syntaktische Funktionen, Pronr fungiert in der vollen oder elliptischen dreigliedrigen Struktur /S → /P → Pronr als direktes, indirektes, reziprokes oder Präpositionalobjekt. 2. Morphosyntaktische Funktionen, Pronr fungiert in der zweigliedrigen Struktur S ← PPronr und der eingliedrigen Struktur P-Pronr, in denen der Komplex P-Pronr eine bestimmte grammatische Funktion erfüllt (passive Konstruktionen, unpersönliche Konstruktionen, passive und unpersönliche Konstruktionen mit modaler Bedeutung: Konstruktionen mit qualitativer Bedeutung, Konstruktionen mit permissiver, obligativer, prohibitiver Bedeutung, Konstruktionen mit potentieller Bedeutung, Konstruktionen mit voluntativer Bedeutung); 3. Wortbildende Funktionen, Pronr fungiert in der zweigliedrigen Struktur S → P-Pronr und der eingliedrigen Struktur P-Pronr, in denen der Komplex P-Pronr eine lexikalische Einheit bildet (morphosemantische Funktion und lexikalische Funktion). 4. Stilistische Funktion, fakultativer Gebrauch des Pronr als emotionalexpressive Verstärkung. Im Rahmen der vier Funktionsbereiche wurden insgesamt 17 spezifische Verwendungsweisen des Pronr in Verbindung mit einem Verb beschrieben und geeignete Ausdrucksmittel zu ihrer Wiedergabe im Finnischen aufgeführt. Die auf diese Weise ermittelten funktionalen Äquivalente des bulgarischen Reflexivpronomens können als eine prinzipielle Grundlage für die richtige Interpretation, Differenzierung und Transformation der polyfunktionalen bulgarischen Konstruktionen V + Pronr dienen.

10aContrastive Studies10aсъпоставителни изследвания1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttps://naum.slav.uni-sofia.bg/en/librislavici/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B21976