@article {Guentcheva1989,
	title = {Implications aspecto-temporelles en fran{\c c}ais et en bulgare},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {14},
	year = {1989},
	pages = {26{\textendash}37},
	abstract = {<p>The basic values of the French pass{\'e} simple and the Bulgarian aorist, on the one hand, and the French pass{\'e} compos{\'e} and the Bulgarian perfect, on the other hand, are compared. In French the aspectual distinction between completedness and noncompletedness is not grammaticalized, in contrast to Bulgarian where there is a morphological opposition between perfective and imperfective aspect. The tenses of the first pair always express an event. In the second pair, pass{\'e} compos{\'e} can express an event (in the sphere of the past) and a resultative situation (in the discourse sphere), whereas the perfect expresses a resultative situation in both spheres.</p>},
	keywords = {Contrastive Studies, съпоставителни изследвания},
	author = {Guentcheva, Zlatka}
}
