@article {Vakareliyska2012,
	title = {Archaic Constantinople Typikon Commemorations in the Menologion to Apostolus De{\v c}ani-Crkolez Nr 2},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {36},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {92{\textendash}103},
	author = {Vakareliyska, Cynthia M}
}
@article {Vakareliyska1998,
	title = {A Computer Collation of Medieval Slavic Menologies},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {22},
	year = {1998},
	pages = {14{\textendash}25},
	author = {Vakareliyska, Cynthia and Horissian, Kevork and Pankl, Heather}
}
@article {Vakareliyska1994,
	title = {A Model of the Dative/Accusative Opposition for Slavic Languages Based on Data from Aphasia},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {19},
	year = {1994},
	pages = {7{\textendash}16},
	abstract = {<p>Bulgarian and Russian aphasia patients made approximately twice as many Dative/Accusative case-marker errors on verbs with generally inconsistent interlanguage case markings than on verbs whose interlanguage case marking is fairly consistent. These results suggest that paragrammatic case-marking errors reflect not purely morphological-level impairment, but rather a semantic deficit, i. e., impaired access to individual case-associated semantic features of the verb. Based on the data, it is proposed that {\quotedblbase}conflicting case marking{\textquotedblleft} verbs contain a fairly balanced proportion of both dative- and accusative-associated semantic features, and that the dative/accusative opposition is essentially a temporal one, based on the opposition [+/- cognitive engagement] on the part of the non-agent to the action presented by the verb.</p>},
	keywords = {Contrastive Studies, съпоставителни изследвания},
	author = {Vakareliyska, Cynthia}
}
