@book {Москов2000,
	title = {Език и езикознание : Онтолингвистика. Същност на езика},
	year = {2000},
	publisher = {Ciela},
	organization = {Ciela},
	address = {София}
}
@article {Москов1997,
	title = {Същност на борбата за чистотата на езика},
	journal = {Българска реч},
	volume = {3},
	year = {1997},
	pages = {49{\textendash}52},
	author = {Москов, Моско}
}
@article {Москов1987,
	title = {Прабългарски рунически знак {IYI} за теонима Тангра},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {11},
	year = {1987},
	pages = {15{\textendash}22},
	author = {Москов, Моско}
}
@article {Москов1983,
	title = {Прабългарски рунически надпис},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {7},
	year = {1983},
	pages = {35{\textendash}46},
	author = {Москов, Моско}
}
@article {Москов1981,
	title = {Българо-тюркски езикови контакти {(езикови остатъци, състояние, проблеми)}},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {6},
	year = {1981},
	pages = {80{\textendash}104},
	abstract = {The article is а survey of the studies on Bulgarian-Turkic language contacts made mainly by Bulgarian scholars during the last hundred years. The general periodization of the BulgarianTurkic contacts is made in four periods: 1) an all-Slav-Turkic period (3rd, 4th{\textendash}7th c.); 2) Bulgarian-Slav (Proto-Bulgarian period (7th{\textendash}9th c.); 3) Bulgarian-Turkic (Oguzo-Kipchak) period (11th{\textendash}14th c.); 4) Bulgarian (Ottoman-Turkish period (14th{\textendash}19th, 20th c.). The last period is not discussed. The studies concerning each of the first three periods are divided into three basic groups {\textendash} anthroponyms and ethnonyms, toponyms and hydronyms, appellatives (verbs included). Within the first period the all-Slav early Turkic loan-words are considered. In the second period the following problems are discussed: sources of the Proto-Bulgarian relics; interpretation of the ethnonym българин; anthroponyms of Proto-Bulgarian origin; Proto-Bulgarian hydronyms and toponyms; vocabulary of Proto-Bulgarian origin; indirect superstratum words, words from inscriptions in Proto-Bulgarian, Proto-Bulgarian names for tides, direct superstratum words. The problem of the Pecheneg-Koumanian superstratum concerns the third period {\textendash} anthroponyms, toponyms, appellatives. For each period, the etymological interpretation of every anthroponym, toponym, hydronym and appellative is given briefly without any critical remarks. Finally the problems of the Proto-Bulgarian and Pecheneg-Koumanian superstratum are treated on an etymological plane following the phonetic, morphological, historical and cultural principles. The problem of the Turkic languages as a source of correspondences of the superstratum words and that of the distinction of the Turkic loan-words, are also posed.},
	author = {Москов, Моско}
}
@book {Москов1895,
	title = {История на българската литература},
	year = {1895},
	publisher = {Книжарница Т. П. Джамджиев},
	organization = {Книжарница Т. П. Джамджиев},
	address = {Търново},
	keywords = {Българска литература {\textendash} история},
	author = {Москов, Моско}
}
