@article {Герджиков2000а, title = {Категорията време като хиперкатегория}, journal = {Български език и литература}, volume = {1}, year = {2000}, pages = {3-16}, url = {http://liternet.bg/publish/ggerdzhikov/hyper.htm}, author = {Герджиков, Георги} } @article {Герджиков2000, title = {Организацията на многочленните морфологични парадигми}, journal = {Език и литература}, year = {2000}, pages = {150{\textendash}152}, author = {Герджиков, Георги} } @article {Герджиков1999, title = {Критериите за насоката на субординацията между членовете на граматическите опозиции}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание}, year = {1999}, pages = {57-85}, author = {Герджиков, Георги} } @article {Герджиков1990, title = {Развоят на индоевропейските езици към аналитизъм и някои всеобщи типологични зависимости}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {15}, year = {1990}, pages = {151{\textendash}157}, abstract = {

A method is proposed for measuring various typological indices of morphological paradigms: the average degree of syntheticity (s) and the reciprocal index, the average degree of analyticity (a), the average degree of compositionality (c); the average degree of markedness (m); and the reciprocal index (m), which can be considered as an index of amorphologism (or, in the historical plane, of demorphologization). It is proved on this basis that in language c = a . m and, correspondingly, a = cm. That is why the development towards analyticity leads to the development of composed forms or to demorphologization. Further on, an index of the average degree of discretization of grammatical information on a formal level is introduced (d), and an index of the average degree of polimorphemity of word forms (π) which is one of the indicators of agglutination. On this basis the correlation d = a . π is put forward. Languages tend towards a high d because thus a high degree of isomorphism between the level of expression and the level of content is achieved. However, while in agglutinative languages high d is achieve mainly through high π, i. е. it follows from the agglutinative structure itself, in inflexion languages d is achieved mainly through the increase of a and only partly through the increase of π. And finally out of the first two equations it follows that d = c . m . π (cf. the three ways in which d is increased in the history of Indo-European languages). The correlations are only part of the typological laws which can be explicated in the same fashion.

}, author = {Герджиков, Георги} } @article {Герджиков1983, title = {Тенденцията към аналитизъм {\textendash} определение, метод за измерване, причини, следствия}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {8}, year = {1983}, pages = {46{\textendash}55}, abstract = {

It may be assumed that the degree of analyticity of a certain language corresponds to the average value of grammatical information, carried by the word forms of this language. The paper discusses a method for working out the average value of grammatical information carried by a word form. It is pointed out that the tendency towards analyticity might bring the reduction in the number of substantival categories, but it does preserve and even increases the number of verbal categories. Agglutinative languages distribute the grammatical information among a great number of morphemes. Inflectional languages, on the contrary, focus whole chunks of in- formation on a single morpheme {\textendash} the inflexion. The development towards analyticity results in the situation where, in a similar way, information begins to be transmitted and received by formally autonomous parts. Thus, the very nature of inflexion carries the starting point of the tendency towards analyticity. The analytic organization of a language, however, preserves the maximum autonomy and the distinctive character of word classes, characteristic of inflectional languages.

}, author = {Герджиков, Георги} } @article {Герджиков1982, title = {Тъй нареченото преизказване и въпросът за модалните категории, които глаголът може да притежава}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {7}, year = {1982}, pages = {21{\textendash}38}, abstract = {

In Bulgarian there are four modes of speech quotation, depending on the specific features of the information expressed by the verb: a testimonial mode (modus testimonialis), an inferential mode (modus conclusivus), a reproductory mode (modus renarrativus) and a mode of distrust (modus inveritativus). A clear-cut distinction should be made between the categories {\textquoteleft}mode of expression of the action{\textquoteright} (modus dicendi actionis) and {\textquoteleft}mood{\textquoteright}. The category of {\textquoteleft}mood{\textquoteright} can also be defined as {\textquoteleft}mode of action{\textquoteright} (modus actionis). Linguistic theory must break, once and for all, with the notion that the verb may have no more than one modal category. As any other grammatical category, except in cases of neutralization, the category of modus dicendi is obligatory for the speaker.

}, author = {Герджиков, Георги} }