@article {Стоянов2014,
	title = {Каталански, каталонски, каталунски },
	journal = {Българска реч},
	volume = {20},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {85-87},
	author = {Стоянов, Румен}
}
@article {Стоянов2011а,
	title = {Поради что},
	journal = {Българска реч},
	volume = {17},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {5},
	author = {Стоянов, Румен}
}
@article {Стоянов2011,
	title = {Природа и околна среда},
	journal = {Българска реч},
	volume = {17},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {66-67},
	author = {Стоянов, Румен}
}
@article {Стоянов2011,
	title = {Съжалявам, извинявай, прощавай},
	journal = {Българска реч},
	volume = {17},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {65},
	author = {Стоянов, Румен}
}
@book {Стоянов1999,
	title = {История на българското Възраждане},
	series = {История и култура},
	year = {1999},
	note = {Резюме на английски език.},
	publisher = {Абагар},
	organization = {Абагар},
	address = {Велико Търново},
	abstract = {Изследвани са най-важните въпроси на Историята на Българското възраждане, като се отчита съвременното състояние на научните изследвания. Особено внимание е отделено на периодизацията и същността на Българското възраждане {\textendash} на това, което го сближава и различава от Ренесанса, Просвещението и Революционния преврат в Западна Европа, на икономическите промени в българските земи, на изграждането на новата социална структура на обществото, на идейните основи на възрожденския процес и на формирането на българската нация.},
	isbn = {9544273875},
	author = {Стоянов, Иван}
}
@book {Стоянов1999а,
	title = {Обществените промени (1989-1996) и вестникарският език},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {318},
	publisher = {Международно социолингвистическо дружество},
	organization = {Международно социолингвистическо дружество},
	address = {София},
	issn = {9548818051},
	author = {Стоянов, Красимир}
}
@book {Стоянов1993,
	title = {Идеите за историята : ХХ век},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {310},
	publisher = {Университетско издателство "Св. Климент Охридски"},
	organization = {Университетско издателство "Св. Климент Охридски"},
	address = {София},
	author = {Стоянов, Желязко}
}
@article {Чеппель1984,
	title = {Из истории форм обращения в русском, украинском и болгарском языках},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {9},
	year = {1984},
	pages = {5{\textendash}12},
	abstract = {The forms of the vocative are analysed across three genealogically related languages, of which Russian and Ukrainian developed out of Old Russian and Bulgarian was descended from Old Bulgarian. The analysis clearly manifests some common typological features between Bulgarian and Ukrainian in contrast with Russian, which had lost the morphological markers for the vocative. It seems evident, however, that vocative forms are being reduced due to the identification of the vocative inflections with the masculine and feminine noun forms. It is worth pointing out that Bulgarian is characterized by quite significant phonetic and morphological changes which, to all appearances, have to be accounted for by the loss of the case inflections and the advent of analytism. Ukrainian, on the other hand, has preserved to a much greater extent the traditional morphological markers, characteristic of the Old Russian vocative forms.},
	author = {Чеппель, Виктор С. and Стоянов, Иван А.}
}
@article {Стоянов1981,
	title = {Българските говори на територията на Съветския съюз},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {6},
	year = {1981},
	pages = {237{\textendash}247},
	abstract = {The history of the Bulgarian settlers (361 thousand in number) in the southern Ukraine and Moldavia during the 18th and 19th c. is briefly traced. Despite the presence of different kinds of bilingualism, a certain stability of the dialects is established on different levels of the language structure. At present several types of Bulgarian dialects exist in the USSR: Moesian, Balkan, Thracian, Eastern Rhodope, and North-West Bulgarian, all of which have preserved their characteristics fairly well. Problems of theoretical interest related to the mixture of the different dialect types are also considered. The results of the studies, devoted to a contrastive historical analysis with the dialects of the metropolis, are pointed out. They contain extremely interesting data about the trends of development of the Bulgarian dialects detached from the metropolis for a period of 150{\textendash}180 years. The studies of the numerous lexical loanwords (under the conditions of active bilingualism and multilingualism, especially among the young generation) reveal very specific transformations in the semantic structure of the home lexical basic word stock. The history of the studies of the Bulgarian dialects in the USSR is outlined. The immediate aim of the forthcoming studies is the creation of a Dictionary of the Bulgarian Dialects in the USSR.},
	author = {Стоянов, Иван А.}
}
@book {Стоянов1964,
	title = {Опис на славянските ръкописи в Народна библиотека {\quotedblbase}Кирил и Методий{\textquotedblright}},
	volume = {3},
	year = {1964},
	publisher = {Издателство на Народната библиотека {\quotedblbase}Св. Св. Кирил и Методий{\textquotedblleft}},
	organization = {Издателство на Народната библиотека {\quotedblbase}Св. Св. Кирил и Методий{\textquotedblleft}},
	address = {София},
	author = {Стоянов, Маньо and Кодов, Христо}
}
@article {Стоянов 1939,
	title = {Неразяснени страни на тарикатството},
	journal = {Философски преглед},
	year = {1939},
	pages = {392-396},
	author = {Стоянов, Атанас}
}
