@book {Петрова2010, title = {Училище за утрешния ден. Резултати от участието на България в Програмата за международно оценяване на учениците PISA 2009}, year = {2010}, publisher = {ЦКОКУО}, organization = {ЦКОКУО}, address = {София}, author = {Петрова, С.} } @book {Петрова2009, title = {Димитър Бояджиев 1880-1911. Биобиблиография}, year = {2009}, pages = {112}, publisher = {Регионална библиотека {\quotedblbase}Никола Фурнаджиев{\textquotedblleft}}, organization = {Регионална библиотека {\quotedblbase}Никола Фурнаджиев{\textquotedblleft}}, address = {Пазарджик}, isbn = {9789546842336}, url = {http://www.libpz-bg.com/Dimitar_Boiadjiev.pdf}, editor = {Петрова, Величка} } @inbook {Петрова2008, title = {Балканската фразеология {\textendash} елемент от оста на времето и фрагмент от жив езиков процес}, booktitle = {Балканите {\textendash} език, история, култура. Международна научна конференция, 13-15 април 2007 г., Великотърновски университет {\quotedblbase}Св. св. Кирил и Методий{\textquotedblright}}, year = {2008}, pages = {370-378}, publisher = {Университетско издателство {\quotedblbase}Св. св. Кирил и Методий{\textquotedblleft}}, organization = {Университетско издателство {\quotedblbase}Св. св. Кирил и Методий{\textquotedblleft}}, address = {Велико Търново}, author = {Петрова, Анастасия} } @inbook {Петрова2005, title = {Граматичната картина на света като част от езиковото съзнание на личността}, booktitle = {Как с думи се правят светове}, year = {2005}, pages = {495-503}, publisher = {Университетско издателство {\quotedblbase}Св. Климент Охридски{\textquotedblleft}}, organization = {Университетско издателство {\quotedblbase}Св. Климент Охридски{\textquotedblleft}}, address = {София}, author = {Петрова, Красимира}, editor = {Стефанов, Валери and Тишева, Йовка and Ренета Божанкова} } @inbook {Петрова2005, title = {Синтактични ограничения на рефлексива си}, booktitle = {Как с думи се правят светове}, year = {2005}, pages = {551-556}, publisher = {Университетско издателство {\quotedblbase}Св. Климент Охридски{\textquotedblleft}}, organization = {Университетско издателство {\quotedblbase}Св. Климент Охридски{\textquotedblleft}}, address = {София}, author = {Петрова, Галина}, editor = {Стефанов, Валери and Тишева, Йовка and Ренета Божанкова} } @inbook {Петрова2003, title = {Някои приложения на корпусната лингвистика в езиковедските изследвания}, booktitle = {Шести славистични четения "Славистиката в началото на ХХІ век - традиции и очаквания", 26-27.04.2002 г.}, year = {2003}, publisher = {Сема РШ}, organization = {Сема РШ}, address = {София}, author = {Петрова, Красимира and Красимира Алексова} } @article {Петрова2002, title = {Библиография на Пенка Илиева-Балтова}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {27}, year = {2002}, pages = {195{\textendash}203}, keywords = {bibliography, библиографии}, author = {Петрова, Красимира} } @proceedings {Петрова2002, title = {Обзор электронных ресурсов славянских языков: виды и применение}, year = {2002}, publisher = {МАПРЯЛ}, address = {Велико Търново}, abstract = {

.

}, author = {Петрова, Красимира and Красимира Алексова and Петя Осенова} } @inbook {Петрова2001, title = {WordNet като средство за чуждоезиково обучение}, booktitle = {Научна конференция с международно участие "Обучение без граници. Език и култура. Чуждоезиковото обучение в контекста на ХХI век", . 14-15 ноември 2001}, year = {2001}, publisher = {ДЕО, ИЧС, СУ}, organization = {ДЕО, ИЧС, СУ}, address = {София}, abstract = {

Петрова, К. . , , издаден на CD

}, author = {Петрова, Красимира} } @article {Петрова-Танева2000, title = {Професор Франсис Томсън на 65 години}, journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика}, volume = {24}, year = {2000}, pages = {116{\textendash}123}, keywords = {Francis J. Thomson, Francis Thomson, in honorem, в чест, Франсис Томсън}, author = {Петрова-Танева, Мая} } @article {Петрова1998, title = {Към въпроса за южнославянските преводи на Житието на мъченица Параскева-Петка Римлянка}, journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика}, volume = {22}, year = {1998}, pages = {83{\textendash}109}, author = {Петрова, Мая} } @article {Петрова1996, title = {Втори международен конгрес по медиевистика, 10{\textendash}13 юли 1995 г. Лийдс (Великобритания)}, journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика}, volume = {ХХ}, year = {1996}, pages = {130{\textendash}133}, author = {Петрова, Мая} } @article {Петрова1995, title = {Психолингвистическое исследование лексико-семантических групп с идентификатором сутки в русском и денонощие в болгарском языках}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {20}, year = {1995}, pages = {5{\textendash}13}, abstract = {The article is а part of contrastive semasiologic analysis of lexicosemantic groups with main word (identification) twenty-four hours in Russian and Bulgarian. Note: There are single words with the meaning of {\textquoteleft}twenty-four hours{\textquoteright} in both languages; the corresponding groups consist of words, referring to the parts of day and night. We try to combine traditional linguistic methods and empirical techniques. The psycholinguistic experiment consists of three tasks: to draw {\textquoteleft}24 hours{\textquoteright}; to divide the time period into parts, name them and give their time reference; a free association test.}, author = {Петрова, Красимира} } @article {Петрова1994, title = {Гръцките съответствия на българското съставно сказуемо}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {19}, year = {1994}, pages = {14{\textendash}19.}, abstract = {The paper compares the Greek compound verbal predicate with that of Bulgarian. Similarities and dissimilarities are explained by showing common tendencies (and some peculiarities) in the evolution of the two languages, notably, the loss of the infinitive. We argue that the compound verbal predicates in the two languages are variants of the same deep structure and on the surface exemplify the dominance of finitude in the verbal system.}, author = {Петрова, Славка and Ангелиева, Фани} } @article {Петрова1994a, title = {Новогръцките условни периоди в съпоставка с българските}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {19}, year = {1994}, pages = {18{\textendash}25}, abstract = {The article deals with some peculiarities of the conditional sentences in Bulgarian and in Modern Greek. Similarities and differences are pointed out: the semantics of the conditional period {\textendash} the expression of reality, potentiality and irreality, as well as the nuances of modality depends on the conjunctions and particles used, the tense, but above all, the meaning of the whole phrase in its context. The differences from Bulgarian appear mainly with the use of mood, tense and their coordination with the modal particles; since the Greek verb system is more simplified than the Bulgarian one, the verb forms in Greek acquire more meanings and allow more freedom in combinations with modal particles, as well as in coordination of the predicates in the two parts of the conditional sentence.}, author = {Петрова, Славка and Ангелиева, Фани} } @article {Петрова1992, title = {Психолингвистични проблеми при усвояване на българска лексика от гръцки студенти}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {17}, year = {1992}, pages = {42{\textendash}51}, abstract = {

In this article, а psycholinguistic approach is applied in the discussion of the acquisition of the Bulgarian lexicon by foreign learners. By means of a free associative experiment made with a Bulgarian and a Greek group of students some intercultural differences in the understanding of words equal in linguistic meaning are shown. In the interlanguage comparison, some universal human regularities are manifested, typical of the process of verbal association.

}, keywords = {Language Contacts, Езикови контакти}, author = {Петрова, Славка} } @article {Петрова1990, title = {За произхода и значението на знака {\quotedblbase}ипсилон{\textquotedblleft} и неговите дофонетични варианти}, journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика}, volume = {14}, year = {1990}, pages = {39{\textendash}50}, author = {Петрова, Павлина} } @article {Петрова1989, title = {Първи випуск унгарска филология в Софийския университет {\quotedblbase}Климент Охридски{\textquotedblleft}}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {14}, year = {1989}, pages = {89{\textendash}90}, keywords = {Events, Хроника}, author = {Петрова, Лиана} } @article {Петрова1985, title = {Интернационалната лексика и чуждоезиковото обучение (формално сходни думи в българския, английския, френския и испанския език)}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {10}, year = {1985}, pages = {31{\textendash}38}, abstract = {The paper studies the international vocabulary of formally similar words in Bulgarian, English, French and Spanish. In terms of foreign language teaching objectives, three semantic groups of international words have been distinguished: a) formally similar synonymous words; b) formally similar partially synonymous words; c) formally similar words lacking any semantic correspondence. Some vocabulary teaching techniques applied in the introduction of each group are specified. Having in mind the internalizing of grammar rules as a teaching objective, efforts should be directed towards the learning of formally similar words. Due attention should be paid to their proper phonetic forms, which conform to the phonetic rules of each of the languages described in the paper, as well as to their grammatical characteristics, like gender, combinatorial properties, derivation and word-formation patterns, etc. From an applied linguistics aspect the formally related words are significant as far as they facilitate the overcoming of the language barrier in the teaching of a foreign language.}, author = {Петрова, Стефка and Манолова, Румяна} } @book {Маринов1983, title = {Инвентарни описи на лични фондове}, volume = {Част V. Л.ф. {\textnumero} 1214 Димитър Цончев {\textendash} археолог. Л.ф. {\textnumero} 1658 Петър Детев {\textendash} археолог}, year = {1983}, publisher = {Окръжен държавен архив {\textendash} Пловдив}, organization = {Окръжен държавен архив {\textendash} Пловдив}, address = {Пловдив}, editor = {Маринов, Александър and Петрова, Недялка} } @article {Петрова1981, title = {Висш педагогически институт за чужди езици {\quotedblbase}Пол Лафарг{\textquotedblleft}}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {6}, year = {1981}, pages = {138{\textendash}140}, keywords = {Events, Хроника}, author = {Петрова, Стефка} } @article {Петрова1980, title = {Съпоставителен преглед на видовата категория в българския и френския език}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {5}, year = {1980}, pages = {52{\textendash}57}, abstract = {The paper is a contrastive survey of the category of aspect in Bulgarian and French. Some basic uses of the perfective and imperfective aspects are considered. The French aspect is treated on the lexical, grammatical and syntagmatic levels. Irrespective of the influence of the lexical content of the verb, aspect in Bulgarian is mainly a grammatical category. The lack of a formal aspectual marker in French is compensated for by the use of adverbs, special phrases and above all by the context. The French language makes use of lexical, morphological, syntagmatic and stylistic means to express the category of aspect.}, author = {Петрова, Мария} } @article {Петрова1979, title = {Съпоставителен преглед на функционирането на имперфекта в българския и френския език}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {4}, year = {1979}, pages = {41{\textendash}44}, abstract = {The common and different uses of the imperfect tense in Bulgarian and French are analysed on the morpho-syntactic level: concrete, generalized, habitual, iterative and qualificative. The modal uses of the imperfect are also discussed: optative, the imperfect instead of the futur, the imperfect instead of the pr{\'e}sent, the imparfait instead of the futur imparfait instead of futur hypoth{\'e}tique simple, and imparfait hypocoristique which has no formal equivalent in Bulgarian.}, author = {Петрова, Мария} } @article {Петрова1977, title = {Поетическите опити на Фридрих Енгелс и преводите им в България (Die dichterischen Versuche von Friedrich Engels und ihre bulgarischen {\"U}bersetzungen)}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {2}, year = {1977}, pages = {126{\textendash}156}, abstract = {Friedrich Engels hat seine poetischen Werke im jugendlichen Alter geschaffen im Zeitraum 1838{\textendash}1842. Seine ersten literarischen Versuche entstanden unter dem starken Einfluss der Gruppe {\quotedblbase}Junges Deutschland{\textquotedblleft}. Als literarische Muster w{\"a}hlte Engels die Werke Goethes, Lessings, Schillers, Heines und B{\"o}rnes. Freiheitsstreben, revolution{\"a}rer Optimismus, Glaube an das Volk und das klare Bewusstsein der sozialen Bedeutsamkeit der progressiven Literatur bestimmten die ideell-thematische Eigenart seiner Poesie. Sein Stil wirkt expressiv, emotionell, dynamisch, dr{\"u}ckt Parteinahme und Polyvalenz aus. Die Zeitschrift {\quotedblbase}Наша родина{\textquotedblleft} (Heft 8, Jg. VIІ, S. 4) ver{\"o}ffentlichtе im Jahr 1960 zum ersten Mal zwei Gedichte von Friedrich Engels: {\quotedblbase}Beduinen{\textquotedblleft} und {\quotedblbase}Deutsche Julitage{\textquotedblleft}, nachgedichtet von dеm bekannten bulgarischen Dichter Krastjo Stanischev. Dem {\"U}bersetzer ist es gelungen, die Bilder des Originals zu erfassen, den sozialen Ton hervorzuheben, die national-historische F{\"a}rbung zu betonen. Unter dem Einfluss seiner marxistischen Weltanschauung pr{\"a}gte Stanischev den revolution{\"a}ren Optimismus im Gedicht {\quotedblbase}Deutsche Julitage{\textquotedblleft} st{\"a}rker aus, eine Nachdichtungen erreichen die Dynamik und die Expressivit{\"a}t des individuellen Stils von Engels. Vier Gedichte von Engels: {\quotedblbase}Beduinen{\textquotedblleft}. {\quotedblbase}Bei Immermanns Tod{\textquotedblleft}, {\quotedblbase}Der Kaiserzug{\textquotedblleft} und {\quotedblbase}Ein Abend{\textquotedblleft} wurden 1975 in der Zeitschrift {\quotedblbase}Септември{\textquotedblleft} (Heft 11, Jg. XXVIII, S. 100{\textendash}121) in der {\"U}bersetzung von Tschilo Schischmanov ver{\"o}ffentlicht. Als Vertreter der {\"a}lteren literarischen Generation hat der {\"U}bersetzer versucht, durch Verwendung von Archaismen den gehobenen Stil von Engels ad{\"a}quat wiederzugeben. Stilistisch unzul{\"a}ssig ist jedoch der Missbrauch der Phraseologismen aus der Volkssprache im Requiem {\quotedblbase}Der Kaiserzug{\textquotedblleft}. Tschilo Schischmanov h{\"a}lt die metrischen Besonderheiten des Originals exakt ein. Stanischev und Schischmanov streben eine ad{\"a}quate {\"U}bersetzung durch die Interpretation an. Die Paraphrase seltener aufgreifend, vermitteln beide {\"U}bersetzer eine sachgem{\"a}{\ss}e Vorstellung von der Poesie Friedrich Engels{\textquoteright}.}, author = {Петрова, Красимира} }