@article {Милева2001,
	title = {Езикови модели за постигане на атрактивност в чешката и българската {\quotedblbase}жълта преса{\textquotedblleft}},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {26},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {22{\textendash}32},
	abstract = {The author points out that, in spite of its bad reputation, the {\quotedblbase}yellow press{\textquotedblleft} deserves the attention of linguists and offers her own observation on the linguistic means aimed at achieving attractiveness in its texts. The analysis is based on material from the tabloids published in the Czech Republic and in Bulgaria.},
	author = {Милева, Силвия}
}
@article {Милева1999,
	title = {Значимостта на личността и творчеството на Александър Теодоров-Балан през погледа на чешките филолози},
	journal = {Българска реч},
	volume = {5},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {16{\textendash}19},
	author = {Милева, Виолета}
}
@article {Милева1993,
	title = {Първа международна конференция по усвояване на чужди езици и междукултурни контакти в София},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {18},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {119{\textendash}120},
	keywords = {Events, Хроника},
	author = {Милева, Ралица and Грудкова, Велислава}
}
@article {Ликоманова1989,
	title = {За някои особености на съществителните имена за лица от женски пол в славянските езици},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {14},
	year = {1989},
	pages = {5{\textendash}11},
	abstract = {The paper explores the current use of certain derivational formants in feminine gender nouns (of the type професорка/profesorka, лекарка/lekarka) in some Slavonic languages: Bulgarian, Russian, Polish, Slovak, Czech, Slovene and Serbo-Croatian. The highest frequency of this derivational pattern was found in Czech, Slovak, Slovene and partly in Serbo-Croatian. In Russian, on the other hand, the pattern is only colloquial. Bulgarian and Polish are borderline cases. The reasons for the difference in the range of the phenomenon are of an internal-systematic nature and could be clarified in a more thorough investigation.},
	author = {Искра Ликоманова and Милева, Виолета}
}
@article {Трифонова1989,
	title = {Х международен конгрес на славистите (София, 14{\textendash}22.IX.1988)},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {14},
	year = {1989},
	pages = {113{\textendash}128},
	keywords = {Events, Хроника},
	author = {Трифонова, Йорданка and Гешев, Валентин and Ангелова, Искра and Бояджиева, Елисавета and Милева, Виолета and Малджиева, Вяра and Виларова, Маргарита and Михалик, Ришард}
}
@article {Милева1988,
	title = {Някои основни типологични сходства между съвременния словашки и съвременния български език},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {13},
	year = {1988},
	pages = {69{\textendash}72},
	abstract = {This article presents a pioneer study of some elements of Slovak and Bulgarian belonging to various levels in the linguistic structure. Although these are similar in form and meaning in both languages, they differ substantially from the corresponding elements in Czech. The paper claims that some word-formative and lexical elements merit special attention since they show the similarities between Slovak and some Bulgarian dialects, i. e. West Bulgarian and Rupian dialects as the initial study indicates. The paper points to the possibilities for new findings and provides some considerations on the problem of South Slavic elements in the Slovak language as well as the relationships between the Slavic languages in general.},
	author = {Милева, Виолета}
}
@article {Милева1981,
	title = {Употребите на служебната дума да в съчиненията на Климент Охридски},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {5},
	year = {1981},
	pages = {74{\textendash}83},
	author = {Милева, Недка}
}
@article {Милева1980,
	title = {Характерна модална експресивност на императива от свършен вид с отрицание в полския език в съпоставка с българския книжовен език},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {5},
	year = {1980},
	pages = {49{\textendash}52},
	abstract = {An essential difference between Polish as a West Slavic language and Bulgarian as South Slavic is pointed out. In Polish the negative perfective imperative is actually a specific syntactic mood, the cautioning mood (Nie wylej tei wody!). Such a form of the imperative is impossible in modern standard Bulgarian (cf. Да не излееш водата!). The explanation of the expressiveness of this construction is to be sought in the aspectual semantic features of the verbal forms in the light of some of the latest studies of the category of aspect.},
	author = {Милева, Виолета}
}
